Douglas was also responsible for overseeing and regulating Aborigines, drawn from the Aboriginal tribes in western and northern Cape York, working in the
Some went voluntarily, seeking adventure in the new world; some were kidnapped and forced to work as divers; many were sold for a bag of flour by tribal elders, who themselves were exploiting the young men.[3]
This was poignantly illustrated in 1890 when, after a lugger had been stolen, two Aborigines from the Batavia River region were captured by pearl-shellers and brought to Thursday Island to stand trial. Douglas wrote to the colonial secretary in London :
I felt some sympathy for them – they looked like frightened wild things who were in mortal terror of their lives. It is difficult to know what to do with them. We are trying to find an interpreter who understands their language. They have offended no doubt, but what possible conception can they have of our forms of law.[9]
On another occasion, following the theft of a boat, Douglas dismissed it as being prompted “on the part of some hired blacks, merely by the desire to return home as their period of service had expired.”[10] Douglas ’s role in protecting Aborigines from the worst abuses of the pearl-shellers was resented by employers,[11] as was his support for the Mapoon mission. Fisheries employers were concerned that many Aborigines living and working on the mission and coming under the influence of missionaries would refuse to work in the fisheries.[12]
a very worthy man, most conscientious and strict … The inhabitants, we were told, or at least many of them, want to get rid of him, the real objection I believe being that he is too upright for them.[14]
On northern Cape York, Douglas did what he could to improve conditions for Aborigines. He wanted to set up a system similar to that of the Mamoose in Torres Strait, and arranged for Yarra-Ham-Quon and Tong-Ham-Blow, the chiefs of the Jardine River and Seven Rivers tribes, to visit Thursday Island . There they experienced “something of the customs and laws of the Whites,” agreed to govern their community in a similar manner, were given farm and household implements, and installed as ‘Kings.’ However, Douglas believed that no “lasting beneficial results” would occur until a “sufficiently disinterested” European was prepared to live among the tribes on a permanent basis.[15] Moreover, despite his support for the Mapoon Mission, by 1903 Douglas despaired of countering the pernicious effects of European contact on the Aboriginal population of the Cape York Peninsula : “The poor things …It is very difficult to save them.”[16]
[1] John Douglas to Samuel Griffith, 22 October 1885 . Queensland State Archives, COL A/443 letter 8225: Lockley, p. 34
[2] Ganter (1999), pp. 43-44
[3] Harris (1990), p. 483
[4] John Douglas to Samuel Griffith, 22 October 1885 . Queensland State Archives, COL A/443 letter 8225. Despite Douglas ’s anger, he recognised that in many of these cases: “it cannot, however, be contended, that any legal offence has been committed, either under the kidnapping Acts of 1872 and 1875 or under the Native Labourers Protection Act of 1884.”
[5] Ibid.; Gaynor Evans. Thursday Island 1878-1914: A Plural Society. BA Hons thesis. University of Queensland , p. 73; Lockley, p. 34
[6] Harris (1990), p. 484; Ward, pp. 46-47 & 65-68
[7] Shirleene Robinson and Kay Saunders. ‘One Long Record of Brutal Cruelty, Bestiality and Debauchery:’ Aboriginal Workers in Queensland ’s Pearling and Bêche-de-Mer Industries in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth centuries. Unpublished article, Brisbane , 2003, p. 9. Despite this, Douglas had to frequently return Aboriginal “boys and girls of tender years” to the Batavia River area. (Douglas (1894), p. 914
[8] Roebuck. p. 35
[9] John Douglas to the Colonial Secretary, 27 August 1890 . Queensland State Archives, COL/A629/9587. Quoted in Gaynor (1978), p. 74. There were also several murders of pearl-shellers by Aborigines. For more information on these, see Ward, pp. 139-48; Gaynor (1978), p. 75; “Murder by Gulf Natives.” Queenslander, 18 November 1893 , p. 1000; “Suspected Murder by Blacks.” Queenslander, 2 December 1893 , p. 1096; Noel Loos. Invasion and Resistance: Aboriginal - European Relations on the North Queensland Frontier 1861 - 1897. Canberra , ANU Press, 1982, pp. 138-41
[10] Brisbane Courier, 6 April 1891 , p. 4
[11] For a further example of attempts by Douglas to ensure that Aborigines were paid fair wages and protected from abuses, see Walter Roth to Colonial Secretary, no date but around May 1898. (Queensland State Archives, COL/142 no 6944/1898 (QSA Z1608)
[12] Ward, p. 136. As Douglas informed his sons, employers opposed the missionaries “because they did a good deal to put an end to the nefarious trade in natives which had been going on.” (John Douglas to his children, 22 January 1895 . McCourt Papers)
[13] Ward, p. 144
[14] Rev. Fred Chatterton. Rough Notes of a Trip from Nelson New Zealand to England , 21 April 1894 , p. 42. Copy held in the National Library of Australia, Mfm M1953
[15] Brisbane Courier, 6 April 1891 , p. 4
[16] “The Hon. John Douglas. Visit to Brisbane . An Interesting Interview.” Brisbane Courier, 11 December 1903 , p. 5
[17] C. B. Marrett, Inspector of Police, Cooktown, to Commissioner of Police, Brisbane , 19 March 1898 . Queensland State Archives COL/142/5931/1898 (QSA Z1609)
[18] John Douglas to the Under Secretary, Home Office, 13 April 1898 . Queensland State Archives, HOM/A18. This area was south of the Mapoon Mission and the where the Aurukun Mission would be established in 1904.
[19] John Douglas to the Under Secretary, Home Office, 20 January & 20 October 1899 . Queensland State Archives, HOM/A22