In
appointing Douglas to the upper house, Lilley consigned Douglas
to a chamber in which any comments he made would be less damaging. The position of postmaster-general involved
managing a complex department and the expenditure of considerable time and
energy, and by assigning him this responsibility Lilley hoped Douglas would
have less time and energy to devote, either deliberately or inadvertently, to
destabilising the ministry.
When Douglas ’s appointment was announced, the Brisbane
Courier marvelled that “the suasion and blandishments to induce” Douglas
and Fitzgerald to work together were “inconceivable.”[2] What were these “suasion and
blandishments”? While not made public at
the time, the journalist William Coote later revealed that Douglas :
would undertake the leadership of the upper house for a
session; but he must be
compensated. At the close of that
session he must have the immigration agency in London .[3]
This
arrangement suited both men.[4] Douglas
needed an ongoing salaried position to service debt incurred when selling his Tooloombah
property, and welcomed the status and prestige the position would bring.[5] Despatching Douglas to Britain benefited Lilley as well, for it removed
him from the Queensland
political arena. Rather than having Douglas inside the cabinet in preference to having him
cause damage from the backbenches or as a member of the opposition, Lilley
cleverly engineered a plan to remove him altogether. This arrangement was never made public.
[1] Ibid.
[2] Brisbane Courier, 10
December 1868 , p. 2
[3] William Coote. “Our Leading
Public Men. No. 1. The Hon. John Douglas.” The Week, 19 May 1877 , p. 616; “Report from the Joint
Select Committee on the Petition of Mr. John Douglas, Together with the
Proceedings of the Committee and the Minutes of Evidence.” Queensland Legislative Council Journals, 1872, p.
811. Douglas
kept details of the deal secret when the appointment was officially announced,
disingenuously observing that his appointment to this position was “far from
being expected.” (“Farewell Banquet to
the Hon. John Douglas.” Brisbane
Courier, 22 September
1869 , p. 3)
[4] Douglas later confirmed this
arrangement and also revealed that, at various times, Mackenzie, Fitzgerald and
Lilley had all offered him the post of agent-general for immigration. However, Mackenzie’s government fell before Douglas could accept, while he declined Fitzgerald’s
offer.
[5] As Coote observed, Douglas
possessed a “tolerably strong dash of ambition.” William Coote. “Our Leading Public Men. No. 1.
The Hon. John Douglas.” The Week, 19 May
1877 , p. 616
[6] “Minutes of the Proceedings of the Legislative Council, Wednesday, 16 December 1868 .” Queensland
Legislative Council Journals, vol 13, 1869, p. 15. In addition to being postmaster-general, Douglas was appointed a member of the executive council
and leader of the government in this chamber.
[7] The Postmaster-General.
“Adjournment - Detention of the Western mail for the Warrego Election
Writ.” Queensland Parliamentary Debates, vol 8, 1869, p. 188
[8] For mail services to the colony, see Postmaster-General. “Postage Bill.” Queensland
Parliamentary Debates, vol 9, 1869, pp. 509-10. For the telegraph link, see “Telegraph
Communication to the Gulf of Carpentaria .” Queensland
Parliamentary Debates, vol 9, 1869, pp. 281-83. For the mail service via Torres Strait, see
“Mail Communication with England
via Batavia .” Queensland
Parliamentary Debates, vol 9, 1869, pp. 877-78