Saturday, September 19, 2026

Islands of Torres Strait, a talk by John Douglas, 1900

The Queenslander, 27 January 1900, p. 169

ISLANDS OF TORRES STRAIT. LECTURE BY HON. J. DOUGLAS.

Probably no one in Australia is better qualified to speak with a full knowledge upon the subject of the islands and the inhabitants of Torres Strait than the Hon. John Douglas, who since 1885 has filled the office of Government Resident at Thursday Island. He has seen the growth of settlement in the latter place, as before, during his long connection with Queensland public life, he saw that of the colony. It was, therefore, a happy idea to induce him to give a lecture before the Geographical Society, and thus place on permanent record some of his observations and experiences. The public interest aroused alike by the subject and the personality of the lecturer, secured a large attendance, and it may be said that few of the addresses delivered under the auspices of the society have been listened to with greater attention or with warmer appreciation. The chair was occupied by the Right Hon. Sir Hugh Nelson, a very old friend of the lecturer, and, like him, an ex-Premier.

THE CHAIRMAN’S SPEECH.

Sir Hugh Nelson said this was a special meeting of the Royal Geographical Society, and anticipating—and he was proud to say that the anticipations had been verified—that there would be a very good audience, they had very fortunately obtained from the officers in charge of the School of Arts the use of their hall for the purpose of especially listening to his old friend, and, he thought, the old friend of a large part of the audience—(applause)—and one of the oldest public men connected with the colony of Queensland—connected with it in a public way even before Queensland itself was separated from the mother-colony.

They had come to listen to some remarks that Mr. Douglas had kindly undertaken to favour them with, on the subject of Torres Strait, the islands there, and their inhabitants. It was hardly necessary for him to introduce Mr. Douglas because he thought most of them were acquainted with him already, and were aware of his career, which had been a very lengthy one in this part of Australia. He had no doubt that they would be all gratified by listening to him, and also interested as well as instructed. Before he asked Mr. Douglas to commence his lecture he would like to mention that he had received a letter from the Hon. J. R. Dickson, the Chief Secretary, regretting that owing to a cold he was unable to be present. He was sure that they very much regretted that Mr. Dickson could not be present. (Applause.)

MR. DOUGLAS’S LECTURE.

To follow Mr. Douglas with minuteness in his mental tour through the Strait and its many interesting little islands would require more space than we have available for the purpose, but a summary of it will probably be found full of information and interest. Mr. Douglas was full of his subject, and the difficulty with him was not to find material, but to compress his discourse within reasonable limits.

He commenced his lecture by a brief reference to the visit to Torres Strait of Dr. Haddon, of Cambridge University, and his party, and to the researches they had made among the different islands. He then passed on to the subject of very much earlier researches of Captain Cook, the great navigator and explorer, and indulged in a very warm appreciation of the life and work of that eminent man. He paid a high tribute to the accuracy of the observations and the chart which Captain Cook had left for the guidance of those who came afterwards, and made an eloquent appeal for some worthy memorial of his life and work to be erected on Possession Island, on which Captain Cook first raised and saluted the British flag.

Captain Cook, he said, was certainly one of the greatest of navigators, and for us Australians he was the greatest of all explorers and discoverers. We ought to venerate his name as one of the great men of our time. Captain Cook discovered, for all practical purposes, the eastern coast of Australia, and was the first and greatest of all explorers.

He (Mr. Douglas) would like to mention that he had discovered in the library of the society a copy of the original journals of Captain Cook, which had been sent to them by Sir Henry Norman. This book was of the very greatest interest. It was published by the authority of the Admiralty, and was in every respect a faithful record of Cook’s own observations and memoranda made at the time.

Before passing on to deal personally with the subject of his lecture, Mr. Douglas paused to pay a tribute to the bravery and noble effort of the band of explorers led by the ill-fated Kennedy, and he made a strong appeal to the Geographical Society to co-operate in raising a fitting monument to the memory of the leader and those who lost their lives with him in their effort to explore the Cape York Peninsula.

Kennedy, he said, was one of the first of the Australian explorers. He was a brave man, just like the volunteers who had gone to serve in South Africa. He failed, unfortunately, to achieve his design, but he deserved that there should be a monument erected to perpetuate his memory and the memory of his companions at the same time. (Applause.) It was not necessary to spend much money. All that they could ask would be that some landmark or cairn of some kind should be erected on the island on which he was killed, so that it might be seen by the vessels as they sailed through the picturesque Albany Pass.

HOW THURSDAY ISLAND BECAME SETTLED.

Thursday Island, Mr. Douglas explained, was not the original settlement in Torres Strait. At one time Somerset, on the mainland, was a rather important place. It was the place of call, as Thursday Island is now, and the Government buildings were located there. For some reason, however—probably owing to the strength of the tide there, which made steamers feel uncomfortable—it was abandoned, and the settlement was removed to Thursday Island.

Mr. Douglas said he was not certain that the selection of that island was a wise one, because it removed the settlement from the mainland. He believed a safe anchorage could have been found in one of the bays in this part of the Peninsula, and if that had been done it was quite possible, by some wild flight of imagination, the construction of a railway to Somerset might have been projected. As a matter of fact, at one time there was talk of such a railway being constructed, but the removal of the settlement to Thursday Island set the project at rest.

Thursday Island was chosen because the pearlshellers had resorted there, and it was thought most prudent that the Government should follow them. The Police Magistrate (and afterwards the Resident) was moved to Thursday Island, and it became Mr. Douglas’s duty, when in office down here, to effect the change. The selection of Port Kennedy was made at the instigation of Captain Heath.

That island was surrounded by a group of islands which protected it, and constituted a fine anchorage. The actual area of the island was small—he (Mr. Douglas) thought it was less than 900 acres altogether, but he added with a smile, “it is wonderful where you come to go into details what a large space 900 acres really is. There is a population of 1500, and that occupies about a third of the island and there is room for ten times the population.”

It is, he explained, the centre of the pearl-shelling industry. By way of comparison, he said that when he first knew Brisbane in 1851, the population was only one-half the present population of Thursday Island. The centre of the pearl-shelling industry, the island, provided a population of various nationalities. The Europeans, he was glad to say, were still at the head of the list. Japanese came next, and he thought Malays and Manilamen next. The Japanese resident on the island did not anything like outnumber the Europeans, but with those who worked in the boats, there were a little over 2000 aliens.

STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE.

From a strategic point of view, he said Thursday Island is considered of great importance. Some people run away with the idea that the guns of the fort command the Strait, but that is a fallacy. The fort was never placed there with the intention of commanding the Strait. There were many passages which could, and no doubt would, be used if the occasion arose, by ships of war.

The importance of Thursday Island from a strategic point of view lay in that it afforded a convenient harbour and coaling station, and in the event of war every vessel must pass within sight, and no vessel really could pass without it being known.

HORNE ISLAND.

Horn Island, he said, was the seat of their hopes so far as gold was concerned. The position of the diggings was under what was called Horn Hill, from its resemblance to a horn. What they would eventually turn out it was impossible for him to say. Some people thought they were no good, and others that they promised very well indeed.

At any rate, the Melbourne syndicate now working the island were spending a lot of money. They were putting up very expensive machinery, and they hoped for very good returns. He (Mr. Douglas) hoped they would be successful, because they had spent, as he had said, a lot of money and they had about forty men working for them, and in a month or two they hoped to commence crushing.

Of course, it would be a great help if the diggings turned out well, because he desired, above all things, to see a European population settled in the strait, and, of course, the presence of gold diggers would contribute very much to the advancement of Thursday Island.

THE BANKS GROUP.

Having briefly referred to the islands immediately adjacent to Thursday Island, Prince of Wales Island, Booby Island, Goode Island, and Mount Adolphus Island, where the ill-fated Quetta went down, he passed on to describe the islands lying nearer to the coast of New Guinea.

Commencing with the island of Mobyag, he explained that it had a population of about 250 natives and South Sea Islanders. These natives, he was glad to say, had learned to work on their own account; they owned their own pearl-fishing luggers; and they cultivated the land to the extent of providing the vegetables they required. There were some 100 children on the island, and the natives were very anxious that they should be taught English and educated. One of the objects of his present visit was to secure, if possible, a teacher for this island. He would prefer a woman to take up the work, and he was hopeful that he would be able to find one who would undertake the training and tuition of the children on the island.

Mobyag was healthy, and its population was not decreasing. At Badu, which was the native name of the Mulgrave Island, there was a population of about 200. They were a fine people. Like most natives, they were rather lazy, but they engaged in pearl-shelling on what was known as the old ground, and, among other edibles, they cultivated a very superior yam, specimens of which he had given to Captain Pennefather to see if they would grow at St. Helena.

The village was formerly on the eastern extremity of the island, but recently it had been moved to a spot near Green Island, which was often resorted to as an anchorage by the pearl-shelling boats. He had named this new village Greenwell, after his old friend Canon Greenwell, of Durham.

Moa was also a fine island, and there was great diversity in its area. There was a high mountain called Mount Augustus, which rose to an elevation of about 1600ft. There was a good deal of scrub and of pasture land, but there were not many natives on it. Decimated years ago by an expedition from New Guinea, they did not number now more than forty or fifty. The adjacent island was also poorly populated. It was very picturesque, and there was some good land on it.

The chief resident was a man named Jimmie Samoa, and with regard to him a question of nationality arose the other day. Jimmie Samoa had been there as long as he (Mr. Douglas) had been in the strait, and the question arose recently whether he could hold a license for a shelling-boat. The magistrates at Thursday Island went into his case, and decided that as he was not a British subject he must be deprived of his license.

“However,” said Mr. Douglas, “he has grown-up sons, and they are certainly all British subjects. Remember that. They are entitled to all the rights and privileges of British subjects, and I hope we shall see that they secure them. The native-born inhabitants of these islands are all British subjects. They are civilised people; they are being educated; and they are entitled to be, and I say shall be, treated as British subjects. At present they are not even enumerated in the census. I hope that in future account will be taken of them. They are civilised; they marry and are given in marriage; they live in good houses; they are under our jurisdiction; and they are entitled to the same privileges that we enjoy. They are growing up intelligent people, and they want to be educated, even more than our own people; their inclination to be educated even exceeds that of our white population.”

NATIVE SOLDIERS.

Another indication of the civilisation of the natives of these islands, Mr. Douglas said, was afforded by their love of soldiering. Some of them visit Thursday Island occasionally, and they watch the soldiers drilling at the barracks. This has struck them as exceedingly delightful. The people of Mobyag, for instance, have got together a force of thirty men, who dress in a uniform of their own, and are made to look as like our soldiers as possible.

They get a few wrinkles from the sergeant at Thursday Island, and sedulously endeavour to profit by them. They now go through their military exercises almost as well as the soldiers themselves, and he (Mr. Douglas) had no doubt that if the occasion arose, a useful auxiliary force might be raised from the islands of Mobyag, Moa, and Badu.

THREE SISTERS AND DARU.

Mr. Douglas then proceeded to touch briefly on the islands known as the Three Sisters, and to refer to the mysterious predilection which ships seemed to have for drifting ashore there, and to the question of cocoanut cultivation, which he pointed out, was not so easy as some imagine. The cocoanut requires as much attention as any other tree during the first two or three years of its growth, or it will not reach maturity.

The Darnley Islands, he said, had a population of about 250, and of those nearly half were either South Sea Islanders or the children of South Sea Islanders, who had married Darnley women. This island, differing from the other, is of volcanic origin. It is very fertile—a perfect garden, in fact, and the people live entirely on what they grow.

Saibai, nearer still to New Guinea, has a schoolmaster on the island, and a school attended by about 90 children. The Saibai people, even in his time, were absolute savages, but now they are among the most industrious and enterprising of all the Torres Strait natives. They have built a church which will hold as many as the School of Arts hall. The proposal to pass this island over to the New Guinea Government, he said, had his complete approval.

After pausing to glance at some of the other islands which dot these summer seas, Mr. Douglas referred to Daru, now the headquarters of the administration of the western division of New Guinea. This, he explained, was used as the penitentiary for criminals from New Guinea, and was where the natives were trained for the constabulary. The excellent views which he afterwards exhibited and explained showed what a fine body of men they are.

The lantern views with which the lecture was brought to a close brought vividly before the audience the natural features of the islands which had been described.

As already stated, a vote of thanks to Mr. Douglas, moved by Alderman W. Jones and seconded by Mr. A. Muir, was carried by acclamation.

Opening of the Darnley Island Church in 1899

The Queenslander, 28 October 1899, p. 843

DARNLEY ISLAND CHURCH.

A ceremony of more than passing interest to all who are interested in the reclamation of savage races took place in September in far-away Torres Straits. Darnley Island is situated something over eighty miles north-east of Cape York. Twenty-five years ago, when those self-sacrificing missionaries, Messrs. Murray and Macfarlane, landed there the natives were savages, not to say cannibals. To-day the island can boast of what is perhaps the finest church building ever erected for mission purposes on the Australian continent, or on the neighbouring islands. The Darnley Islanders are very proud of their church. And well they may be, for it is the work of their own hands, assisted by some South Sea Islanders, directed by an old identity of the Straits, Andrew Johnson.

When the Government steamer White Star visited the place last month with a party to open the building they found a cricket match in progress between the Darnley Islanders and those of Saibai and Stevens. A stone church and cricket! Could any greater change be imagined than this transition in twenty-five years from savagery and cannibalism to Christianity and cricket? This is not the first church on the island. There has for some years existed a rustic-looking edifice of the native order of architecture, but the inhabitants felt that the degree of civilisation which they had reached entitled them to a more pretentious chapel, and they set to work with a will to give effect to their ambitious ideas.

The new building is of a substantial kind, the walls being of native cement, whitewashed inside and out. The roof is covered with galvanised iron, but the heat is tempered by tastefully woven native mats placed underneath and between the rafters. The interior is not unpleasing in appearance, though it is necessarily not elaborately decorated. Our view was taken just when the finishing touches were being given to the pulpit, hence the shavings and other “litter” which appear in the picture. In the eastern end there is a dais with a pulpit, which is used by the native teacher. On either side there are seats for the choir, the women sitting on one side and the men on the other. Over the pulpit may be seen the punkah—an idea that might well be adopted in many of the Northern “whitefellows’” churches. The ceiling of native mats gives the whole interior a finished aspect.

The church is remarkable for other reasons than that it was built by native hands. It cost only a fraction over £100, and is therefore probably the cheapest building of its size and quality—it holds 250 persons—in Australasia. Also it is free of debt, another rare characteristic. The cost was subscribed as follows:—Darnley Island natives, £48; South Sea Islander residents, £56; Stevens Island, £3; sundry friends, £16; total, £123.

The Darnley Island church owes its existence in great measure to the Rev. James Chalmers, the veteran New Guinea missionary (known to his native flock as “Tamate”). A correspondent tells us that on the 13th September the steamer White Star left Thursday Island for Darnley with the Hon. John Douglas (Government Resident), “Tamate,” and other visitors, their object being to formally open and consecrate the new mission church.

On landing, the party, as already stated, were just in time to see a native cricket match in progress. This cricket is not altogether the game as we know it. The available area for playing is circumscribed. The pitch is situated on the water front, consequently the ball is frequently hit into the sea. But the fielder without hesitation plunges in after it, and runs mount up merrily while he swims back to shore with the ball in hand.

The party on arrival received a hearty island welcome. It is the custom of the country to shake hands with all visitors. “Tamate” in particular was warmly greeted, the natives crowding round him, all eager to grasp the hand of their old friend. The actual ceremony of opening the church was simple and brief. A procession was formed, headed by “Tamate,” and marched, to the music of the ubiquitous concertina, to the church, taking the circuit of the building before entering. The usual religious exercises completed the ceremony. The event is well illustrated by our correspondent’s photographs.

The Darnley islanders all look happy and contented. The island is very fertile, and cocoanuts, bananas, yams, sweet potatoes, and mangoes grow in profusion. Many of the natives have boats, and make a good thing out of black-lipped pearlshell.

Friday, September 18, 2026

Douglas Federation Speech, August 1899

Evening Observer, 29 August 1899, p. 8

A FEDERAL MESSAGE From Thursday Island.

Speech by the Hon. J. Douglas, THURSDAY ISLAND, August 28.

The Hon. John Douglas addressed a large meeting here on Saturday evening on the subject of the past and present of Thursday Island, with special reference to federation. His speech lasted for an hour and a-half, and was received with enthusiasm. He commenced by reviewing the past records connected with Torres Straits, from the time Torres sailed through them in August, 1606, up to the time of the settlement of the Jardines at Somerset and the transference of the harbour of refuge from Somerset to Thursday Island in 1877, with Mr. H. M. Chester as Resident.

Concluding this part of his address, he went on to say:—We have grown, slowly but surely, and are now known all over the world as the Northern sentinel of the island of Australia, and the centre of a thriving local industry. He could hardly be expected to dwell on the history of the years from 1877 to the present; but might revert to them at some future time.

He hastened to the culminating point of modern history now before us—the question to be decided on the 2nd September—Are we for union, or against it? Are we to be one people from Cape Leeuwin to Cape York? Is this great island continent of Australia to be one country, already one by the indissoluble laws of Nature—but why not rather say by the laws of the Great Creator, the Ruler of events in the procession of human affairs? This great country of ours, which during the last century has been won from primitive barbarism, should we not seek to make it still more united by the closest possible political, economical, and racial relationship.

Were we to err on our inheritance during the great reign of her Majesty in the Victorian era? Should we accept this proffered priceless gift, or should we reject it? That was what each elector would be asked to say on the 2nd September. There was no doubt as to what would be the answer. He was going to vote for the union of Australia, bound together indissolubly as one people, inhabiting one country and one continent, which, by the help of God and our good selves, we intend shall never again be divided. That was what he was going to say next Saturday. That was what he was very confident the electors would say.

So far back as 1859—that was before Thursday Island had any being except as the inheritance of King Tarbucket, when he was standing for the Darling Downs, then a part of New South Wales—he made the first declaration for federation. He had stuck to the text ever since. It was not to be supposed that he would forswear his first love in old age. He would stick to federation. He would stick to union—union first amongst ourselves; union with the great country whence we came; and union, too, with our kindred across the seas, and in the United States of America.

He had once scandalised a Cabinet Minister, Lord Derby, by an announcement of that kind in London at a public dinner. Lord Derby was the guest of the occasion, and he (Mr. Douglas) had, in reply to a toast, discoursed about union among ourselves in Australia. The theme roused some enthusiasm among the hearers, but when he went on to speak of a union with our kinsfolk across the Atlantic, the response was rather feeble. Lord Derby looked very glum; nevertheless, he went on, and said that union among ourselves, in Australia, meant a closer alliance with the States of America, and the supremacy of the Anglo-Saxon race.

That was fifteen years ago. Since then there had been some exciting episodes in our history; but things had settled down very much lately. We have shown a really friendly spirit one towards another, which indicated a lasting unanimity. His remarks on that festive occasion alluded to, which aroused a fiery gleam of disapprobation from Lord Derby, would now probably be received with applause as a very pardonable platitude.

He was not altogether in love with the Commonwealth Constitution; there was much in it which he should like to see different. If he had been born in New South Wales, and had inherited a special love of the country in which he was born, he would have voted No, and would have done his best to postpone federation until it could be accomplished on terms more favourable to the mother State. Nevertheless, the people of New South Wales had accepted the bill by such a majority as to leave no room for doubt that they were willing to adopt it, with all its difficulties and responsibilities.

They were prepared to make some sacrifices in order to attain a higher elevation in the status of nationality. That was the object of the Constitutional Commonwealth which we sought to adopt. It indicated a new birth. He did not say that, like the human apotheosis, it had been sown in dishonour; but, like all the efforts of Nature, it had been accomplished, not without some pains of parturition.

Might we not hope and anticipate that this constitutional Commonwealth of Australia would be built up so to illustrate in all its wisdom, strength, and beauty the splendour and beneficence of the Victorian era? The adoption of the Constitution would be for us by far the greatest achievement which has yet been accomplished in our Australian history, and a glorious consummation in the closing years of the Victorian era.

We all had our peculiar notions of what this Constitution might have been, what it might still be made; but there was nothing that should stand in the way and enter a protest against the ultimatum which had already been accepted by commanding majorities of the people of Australia. We approved of the general scope of the measure, and anticipated the greatest benefit from its adoption; but if sacrifices have to be made in order to attain this larger life, had it not been the teaching of all experience that some surrenders must be made?

Before attaining final victory, we must give up some portion of our provincial autonomy in order to enter upon the higher form of government, and expansion into national development. Speaking then on the base of the subject, which permitted the fullest scope for local self-government, at the same time bringing with it extra responsibilities, he concluded with an appeal to them to vote for the bill, recalling an amusing contrast which Disraeli once drew between the lower order of the human species and the angels.

He said there had been a deal of talk about the process of evolution in the order of creation. Darwin’s “Origin of Species” and “Descent of Man” had set people thinking. There was much controversy about these works. Disraeli took advantage of this, and ranged himself on the side of the angels.

Mr. Douglas concluded:—“And so do I; I take my stand alongside those beautiful beings in their white wings and flowing robes, depicted in Dore’s great pictures. There they are, with their celestial countenances beaming in the glorious light of a rising sun, which shines full upon them, and I turn my back on those sad, doubting souls who have gloom shadowed on their whole aspect—the gloom of disappointment and defeat, which presages their final doom. You, too, I am confident, will range yourselves with the hosts of heaven, and will march with them from victory to victory, to the triumphant consummation of our Australian constitutional Commonwealth.”

Thursday, September 17, 2026

1898 letter on Japanese in the Torres Strait pearling industry by Fred Hodel and two responses

The Brisbane Courier, 23 July 1898, p. 9

THE JAPANESE QUESTION

Sir,—In a recent leading article you review the report of the Government Resident on Thursday Island, and dealing with the Japanese question you assert—“and Mr. Hodel is astray in telling us that their (the Japanese) power has ‘ruined nearly all the white labouring men in Torres Straits,’” the assertion having reference to a letter which you published from me. I fail to note where the Government Resident has in any sense disproven my assertion, although I admit my contention would have been better expressed by the addition of two words, “who were,” between “men” and “in Torres Straits,” as I was referring more especially to the past history of Torres Straits. At the time of the Resident’s report there were few white “labouring” men in Torres Straits, if we accept the word as applicable to those engaged in manual labour—divers, tenders, carpenters, painters, jumper, and suchlike. Clerks, counter-jumpers, storekeepers, commission agents, parsons, doctors, publicans, bankers, and Government employees are still left in the Straits, and are not likely to be driven out of it by the Japs, for the heavy annual expenditure by the Government upon their officials and the garrison, by shipping companies and the travelling public, and by the small mining developments, must create employment for a number of other white people; but beyond these I think there exists but a few white master shellers, one boat-repairer, a butchering firm, an undertaker, a grave-digger, and possibly a rouseabout or two who have not yet been hunted from the Straits. The interests referred to necessitate their existence.

When I went to Torres Straits ten years ago there were a large number of European boatowners and divers, and a few white tenders. Their number must have totalled over forty; but how many of those men are left? Perhaps I am within the bounds if I put the number down at less than a dozen. The number of white owners has increased in connection with the commission agents and the Clark combinations; but the total would not equal the number previously existing, even though the number of boats engaged in the industry has nearly doubled during the period under review. The forty men I refer to were mostly divers, but the white men of the present day are men of means who do not themselves dive. They have conserved profits or introduced capital from Southern centres; and yet with all their expenditures the number of white men has decreased, while in one year the impecunious Japanese increased their number by nearly 300.

When the late Premier visited Torres Straits in 1894, I acted as the corresponding medium for the white “working” shellers, who then numbered over twenty. They made a fervent, but I am sorry to say, fruitless, appeal to the Government to restrict the Japanese, for disaster stared them in the face. Man’s greatest comforter and best friend, hope, had vanished from their hearts; and they appealed for the sympathy of the authorities as men who felt themselves gradually slipping over a dangerous precipice. At the present time I know of only five of those men left, and only one of the leaders who spoke with such deep conviction is now in the Straits. I feel justified in asserting that most of those who collapsed were driven from the industry mainly through the evil influence of the Japs. Add to the general depression in the industry owing to the low price of shell and its scarcity, the “funk” created by the Japanese, who rushed every little patch of shell discovered by the white divers, although they would not prospect for themselves, and you have the reason why they sold out or abandoned the boats, upon which, in nearly all cases, large deposits had been paid. The departure of these men with their families was a decided loss to the Straits.

Of the other white men driven from the Straits, two of them are now in Dunwich who might still be earning a bare living at repairing boats but for the keen competition of Japanese boat-builders. What has become of the other dozen or so white boat-builders if they have not been driven out by the Japanese cheap labour? Where are the numerous white artisans of eight years ago? Carpenters, painters, rouseabouts, and others? I could name a score of these who left partly because Japanese performed at cheaper rates the work they relied upon for their subsistence. The doctors had two Japanese competitors in my time; while the hard-working white washerwomen were offering special prayers for the Japs because the latter had secured the most important of the work—that from the garrison. The house and nurse girls had long since been out of the running; in fact, I don’t think they were ever allowed a foothold in the Straits.

The Government can do little or nothing to protect white labourers now, but they can do much to create future employment for white men in Torres Straits. In the sugar industry it is ordained the Kanaka must be an agricultural employee, pure and simple; and why is it asking too much to seek the restriction of the Japanese to working as seamen or tenders, or even divers, if necessary? If the restriction kept them off the shore work, some good would be done; but even greater good would eventuate were they forbidden to own or license boats (excepting those now holding licenses). This restriction (upon “all” coloured men, of course), would ease the minds and save the downfall of many white master-shellers, and clear the way for the encouragement once more of white divers. If this course made openings for only fifty white men, it would create a healthier and better tone in Torres Straits; and their presence would be of more value than 500 Japanese. All this can be done without endangering the industry or affecting prejudicially the vested interests concerned, and has already been done in South Australia (Northern Territory).

Let it not be forgotten the money earned by the Japanese is rarely circulated with white people, as the Kanaka circulates his; but it goes either to Japan or to build up storekeeping and other combinations which are rivals to white people. It would be interesting to learn what amount is sent to Japan each year through the Savings Bank, even though the amount thus sent away only represents only a small portion of the wealth drawn to Japan from Torres Straits, for a departing Japanese is like a departing Chinese—very careful his wealth is not known. This information might be made available by a motion in the Assembly from Mr. W. H. Browne, whose persistency in opposing the Japanese is praiseworthy.

It is pleasing to me to note the Hon. John Douglas, in his report admits the possibility under altered conditions of manning the industry entirely with white men, as contended by myself in a letter to your columns many months ago. Under present conditions it is not practicable, but I am hopeful that many years hence will witness the industry worked by white men.

The following sentence from the Government Resident’s report commands more attention than has been devoted to it:—“My somewhat prolonged experience in these latitudes leads me to come to the conclusion that we may, without prejudice to our future prospects as a people, avail ourselves of such assistance as we can obtain from an alien population in order to develop our nascent industries, provided we take care to build up our own native-born population in such a way as to constitute it the dominant factor in our Constitution.”

“Avail ourselves of such assistance * * * provided we take care to build up our own native-born population,” says the hon. gentleman, and so says Mr. Clark, I think, and, in fact, so say all the opponents of Japanese in the pearlshelling fishery. But does the indifference—(remarkable indifference, when viewed by the side of the prompt action of South Australia, where the evil had hardly commenced its work)—of the Queensland Government tend to “build up our own native-born population” and restrict the aliens to “assisting” the development of the industry? * * * It has been pretty conclusively proven in Torres Straits that the Japanese are not content with “assisting,” but have assumed “control” of about one-fourth of the product of the fisheries; and the other three-fourths will slowly but inevitably follow if the M‘Ilwraith-Nelson-Byrnes Ministry are not replaced by a more sympathetic party. Mr. James Clark appeals on behalf of the white shellers, that the Japanese may be allowed to “assist” only, the Royal Commission’s report recommended a similar restriction, and the Government Resident, after a “somewhat prolonged experience,” can go no further than advocate that aliens be allowed to “assist” the development of the industry; and yet the Government (and yourself, Mr. Editor) cannot be induced to support the Japanese as “assistants” only, even though another alien (the Kanaka) is relegated to a similar position in the sugar industry.

Even though I have used my pen (and will continue to use it) strenuously to oppose the building up of any industry upon a foundation of “syndicates,” still I readily accept this form of development as preferable to allowing the industry to pass entirely into the hands of aliens. If we cannot have all white men in the industry, or even only white divers, then at least let us have only white owners. Only one “pearl king” controlling all the shellers and distributing the profits in the colony must be more beneficial to the colony than even a multitude of alien owners sending the profits to another country, and also drawing their food supplies from that foreign country.

You quote Mr. Douglas as stating “there must be Japanese labour if there is to be a pearl-shelling industry.” I do not think the hon. gentleman will thank you for crediting him with such a statement, for my reading of his report is that “alien” labour is a necessity, and there are many forms of alien labour not so objectionable as the Japanese, because they do not drain the wealth from the country, but marry and settle down in the colony. Mr. Douglas knows, as well as all other who resided in the Straits years ago, that the shelling industry was more profitable when Japanese were almost unknown to it. Kanakas were then more largely employed; but they, too, have fled before the Japs. Most shellers prefer Kanakas in their boats. Failing Kanakas, the shellers would have little difficulty in getting Malays from Singapore. In fact, does it not seem strange that shellers should indent Malays from Singapore when labour is scarce if the Japs were better and a necessity? I have never heard of Japs being indented by the shellers; but it is not very long ago since a number of Malays were indented from Singapore.

Another questionable statement in your leader is contained in the sentence, “From which it follows that the revival of the industry . . . is due to that very increase of alien labour.” Surely you are ignorant of the fact that the price of pearl-shell had gone down below £100 per ton three years ago, while last year it reached over £200 per ton. The average value at the two periods would show that in the “revival” the shell brought to its owner quite double what it did in the days of depression. This was the cause of the great improvement; and the influx of the Japanese had, in my opinion, very little whatever to do with it. They brought no money into the industry, and preferred to live upon their friends to accepting a low wage. They were the first and only alien race to combine and maintain high wages as seamen in the Straits. Rather credit Mr. Clark and a few other Europeans with rendering some assistance by spending money in introducing other boats.

Mr. Douglas says, and you endorse the statement in your leader:—“The Government of Japan is quite willing that emigration should be controlled. It is controlling the emigration with a vengeance when it allows a vessel to leave port for Queensland with nearly 100 Japanese bearing passports, as was done this year. It may be controlling it to suit the desires of the Byrnes Ministry, who appear to have taken no notice of the fact; but it is hardly in accordance with what the public have been led to believe would result from signing the treaty.

Discussing the agitation on this question, you do not admit of any correspondent being disinterested. You say, “these cries have little in common beyond the self-seeking we use the term in no disparaging sense) of those who make them.” Who, I ask, has more right to raise a cry, or seek the redress of evils, than those most injured by the dangers? And, again, I ask, is it not possible to find correspondents who are as disinterested as even you, Mr. Editor? The gentleman who so ably disproved the Premier’s interpretation or explanation of the Japanese treaty is a perfect stranger to myself, and as I know almost all connected with the industry, I fancy he can claim to be disinterested. My only claim to take part in the discussion is the fact I have lived eight years amongst the shellers themselves, as their “mouthpiece,” in a sense, and, as previously stated, acted as secretary for the one-boat owners in their correspondence to the Premier. Nearly all my old co-workers in the cause have been ruined, and most have gone I know not where; but while I am able to throw any light upon the question, I gladly seek your permission to be able to do so. Beyond that, my interests in the discussion extend no further than that of your good selves, unless it be that a good Japanese tenant, who occupies a cottage owned by the writer on Thursday Island, should take umbrage and vacate his present domicile—to my loss. But if I can open the way for the return of a few white divers into the pearlshelling industry, with the hope of their ultimate expansion, then I am amply repaid. Or, failing that, if I can assist to check the expansion of the Japanese, and thereby render a service to even the white capitalist owners, then my writings will give me peace and pleasure.—I am, sir, &c.,

FRED. C. HODEL.
Bald Hills, 17th July.

Two replies to the letter were printed in The Japanese Question, Brisbane Courier, 16 August 1898, p. 7. The first is signed J. Crase, Clayfield; the second A. Corran, Thursday Island 

THE JAPANESE QUESTION.

Sir,—In your issues of the 8th and 23rd instant you published leaders, respectively, on the Thursday Island report of the Hon. John Douglas and on the correspondence in your journal by Messrs. James Clark and Hodel on the “Japanese Question.” Both of these leaders, I feel sure, will have been read by all classes of the people with more than usual interest, seeing that the future welfare of the entire community (not even excepting those engaged in journalism) is involved in this Asiatic problem. Commenting on the Thursday Island report you expressed yourself as follows:—“Can we, admitting Japanese as labourers, take the step of refusing to admit them as employers, or letting them pass (as they have a rare faculty of passing) from the labourer to the employer? Now, we have no sympathy with many of the statements made on this subject. We have before exposed the attempt to find in the alleged Japanese treatment of Britons a basis for our drastic treatment of the Japanese.”

Now, to say the least, this is a very kind and sentimental phase of the doctrine of an ultra-cosmopolitanism, obviously founded on the erroneous assumption that the nations of the world are one family, and that in framing our economic policy we should not only consider what is good for our own people, but what is beneficial to other communities as well; hence, we are advised to submit to the inevitable, and raise no defences to preserve our industries from the destructive industrial warfare which is constantly raging between nations in the efforts of the strong to supplant the weak. To attempt to establish the negative that a people should not discriminate in favour of its own citizens in legislating to advance their industrial interests, appears to me to be an indulgence in very extravagant ideas and vain assumptions.

That national interests ought not to be sacrificed in the interests of a “World State” has been ably dealt with by John W. Burgess in his “Political and Constitutional Law,” wherein, among other things, he said:—“Mankind cannot yet act through so extended and ponderous an organisation, and many must be the centuries, and probably cycles, before it can. The national State is the most perfect organisation of the world for the interpretation of the human consciousness of right. It furnishes the best vantage ground yet to be attained for the contemplation of the purpose of the sojourn of mankind upon the earth. It represents itself the highest good. It is the highest entity. The world has, as yet, no organisation into which a State may merge its existence. The duty of a State to the world is a duty of which the State is the highest interpreter. The highest duty of a State is to preserve its own existence, its own healthful growth and development.”

Surely the above great fundamental principles may be regarded as a sufficient refutation of your contention against “our drastic treatment of the Japanese.” Your asking Mr. Hodel to look again at the leader of the 8th instant to make sure that he had not misrepresented your journal, by stating that it cannot be induced to support the Japanese as “assistants only,” made me sufficiently interested in the controversy to again read it myself. Permit me, then, to say that I was struck as to the import of the following sentence:—“But it is not the policy of the British Government to permit people to land on our shores and then impose upon them special disabilities.” In this connection I beg to point out that it is not at all likely that such treaty conditions as would suit Great Britain would be equally acceptable to Queensland. On the contrary, the position of the Japs with regard to us is in an intense degree to exploit our resources, to win our wealth, by purchasing from us raw material, and selling to us manufactured goods. They appreciate in the most practical way the opportunity which is theirs, and they propose to realise it if possible without stir or undesirable agitation. The bogey which has been set up of effective personal invasion may be extremely useful to occupy the minds of those hide-bound and truly denationalised theorists of an obsolete political economy. But, while the terms of the treaty are being discussed and carried out, it may be discovered that it is really of little use to have any anxiety regarding it, for by that time Japan will have the London, Birmingham, Manchester, and Leeds of the Southern world, and Queensland the mines, fields, and pastures of the raw materials, and the mean, narrow, and serf-like life which naturally appertains thereto.

The outlook for Queensland is not of a great and populous white man’s land, but of a few scattered winners, and garnerers of the various raw materials. These may live and produce by the grace of the Asiatic Powers, as did the Jews of old, under the accepted mastery of the old Assyrian kings, and by-and-by a Mongol Nebuchadnezzar may resolve to swoop down with his own multitudes of people and deport us elsewhere. It was just before self-government was granted to this colony that Commodore Perry negotiated the treaty with Japan, after steaming into the harbour of Yokohama, with a squadron of United States war vessels. The exact date of the treaty with the United States was the 31st March, 1854, and with Great Britain in 1858. Thus Japan, after a withdrawal of 216 years, opened her ports to foreign traffic, and resumed intercourse with the outer world. Since then she has educated her youth at all the best institutions throughout the Western world, and has gathered the best features of the systems and methods of the West, and has built up a social organism peculiar to herself. The “London Times” not long since mentioned “the new activity of the country of the Mikado as a dread portent in the commercial sky.” Under the terms of the treaty between Japan and China at the close of the late war, we may reasonably expect that the people of China will develop as rapidly as those of Japan, under similar opportunities and influences. If China adopts the same vigorous and enterprising policy, it is impossible to compute her industrial power after her people have had the training Japan has had. What the vast population of these two countries will be capable of accomplishing when it is intelligently directed as an industrial force, staggers human comprehension, and it may be that Western nations, in order to preserve their higher civilisation, will be compelled to adopt a system of non-intercourse with Asiatic races, or by treaties, or otherwise, outlaw the products of their low-priced labour. Our own progress and civilisation are based upon the earning power of our productive forces. If we are to be compelled to compete with Japan and China, their rates of wages must rise, or ours fall, until the two are equalised. If we are to meet them half-way, the earning capacity of this colony must be impaired one-half, and to this extent the volume of trade, business of every description, and values of every kind, must be affected.—I am, sir, &c.,

J. CRASE.
Clayfield, 25th July.


THE JAPANESE QUESTION.

Sir,—The interesting instances of Japanese success at Thursday Island, as related by Mr. F. C. Hodel in your issue of 8th July, will doubtless help to draw attention to this, the greatest and most real danger threatening Australia—primarily Queensland, and subsequently the other colonies. My first object, however, in writing now is to express resentment at the hurtful and unjust inference to be drawn from Mr. Hodel’s remarks in “the third case,” which specially concerned himself. On reading the paragraph referred to, it appears that this “third case” deals more with other people’s business than his own, since he states, in his eagerness to prove the ability of this Japanese house-boy of his, that he understands that the “T. S. Pilot” had been manipulated single-handed by him from the time the copy left the editor’s pen until the paper was in the runboy’s hands, as well as executing the usual weekly round of job printing! If this were true, the possibility of a Japanese proprietary for the newspaper on Thursday Island would not be very remote. But it is not a fact. It takes two white men and a white boy now to get through the work to be done; and Mr. Hodel’s receptive faculty, which enables him to understand one Japanese boy doing the whole of it, shows that he is more credulous, to say the very least, than most men of his profession. Kasuga, the boy in question, served under articles of apprenticeship, or an agreement the equivalent of such, for three years; and was required, besides performing his printing-office duties, to work in Mr. Hodel’s house and garden, and also on his boat, mostly used for pleasure purposes. Kasuga’s apprenticeship was concluded just at the time the change in proprietary of the “Pilot” took place. There was no one else available or conveniently procurable, at the time to do the necessary mechanical work on the paper, and in employing the Jap Mr. Hodel’s successor was the victim of circumstances. Neither pleasure at the Jap’s ability, nor anything else but the necessity of getting the work done, was the reason for engaging the Jap. His was the only labour available, and, perforce, it was utilised. However, the “Pilot” office does not now turn out full-fledged Japanese compositors after three years’ apprenticeship, nor has Kasuga been employed on the paper for some months past; and it is a pity, for the sake of Mr. Hodel’s consistency in his present anti-Japanese feeling, that it can be said he taught at least two Japanese, under properly drawn up indentures, something of an English printer’s trade.

Perhaps, Mr. Editor, you will permit me to say a few words on the Japanese question itself? To Thursday Islanders interested in the restriction of Japanese, there has appeared to be an unworthy indifference displayed by the Government in this matter. The assurances given by Mr. Dalrymple in Parliament last session, Sir Horace Tozer’s utterances on the question, and the speech at Warwick by the new Premier, wherein he touched on the matter and sought to allay fears of an influx, all seem to indicate a failure on the part of these gentlemen to appreciate the really serious nature of the matter. Mr. Byrnes, at Warwick, inferred that the number of Japanese in the colony was then no greater than twelve months previously. However, Mr. Douglas, in his last report on Thursday Island, just published, states that the number of Japs on the island on the 1st March, 1898, was 619, against 331 in 1897, the number of females being 76 as against 48. We know here that this increase is mainly due to arrivals from places outside of Queensland. And they continue to come. Only last Saturday did the Tsinan land here a batch of fifty-nine, the curious feature of whose landing was that they all had passports. This shows distinctly the failure of the means adopted to secure the restriction of the Japs. The issuing of the passports, we were assured last year, was a means which would effectually block them leaving Japan for Queensland. And doubtless the Government is aware that the Japs take out passports for other countries, thence immediately reshipping to Queensland, thus defeating the regulations.

But it is another curious feature of this business that if a Japanese comes without a passport, we have not a tittle of power nor authority to prevent him landing, as the first occasion on which the shipping master here demanded passports from Japanese arriving revealed that there was no means of refusing a landing to those who had no pass. It is also possible to judge from this that the Government of Queensland is sincere in its efforts to lessen the influx of Japs; and there is sufficient evidence obtainable to conclude that the Japanese Government is desirous of serving Queensland in restraining the emigration of their people to this colony; yet the foregoing shows that the means employed are not efficacious, and another and better way of securing the object in view must be discovered. Being fully aware of all the facts and circumstances, the Government must be in a position to judge of the best course to pursue in order to overcome the little Japanese trick, which set at nought mutual regulations between Japan and Queensland. But the situation here is becoming so menacing, in whatever relation it is considered, that promptness in dealing with the matter should be the first characteristic of the Government’s action. The longer it is left neglected, the more difficult will it become to deal with. If not already too late, this Japanese bull must be taken by the horns and tied down, if not killed outright.—I am, sir, &c.,

A. CORRAN.
“Pilot” Office, Thursday Island, 21st July. 

Torres Straits Hospital annual report 1899

TORRES STRAITS HOSPITAL REPORTS AND BALANCE-SHEET FOR THE YEAR 1899.

TO THE SUBSCRIBERS. Committee’s Report

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN—

Your Committee beg to lay before you their Report for the year 1899.

The Surgeon’s report shows that the work of the Hospital has been steadily maintained.

Dr. Salter, who during the early and succeeding years of the Hospital showed a deep interest in the institution, has temporarily severed his connection with the Island in order to enjoy a well earned relaxation from work. On his invitation Dr. White has temporarily filled the position vacated by Dr Salter, and the Committee having satisfied themselves from some months’ experience of Dr. White, that his professional services will be acceptable, have confirmed the temporary appointment and placed him in permanent charge of the Hospital.

During the year a sum of £258 has been spent upon various necessary improvements.

It is proposed to erect a new ward to be specially reserved for fever cases, and the Government has consented to contribute half the total cost, which is estimated at £460.

The Treasurer’s report shows that the financial position is a satisfactory one, and the Committee avail themselves of this opportunity to express their gratitude to Mr. Hamilton, the member for the district, for timely assistance in securing the support of the Government to our institution, which has proved itself of the greatest utility to the seafaring population.

We feel bound once more to call attention to the paucity of European contributions. In this respect the Japanese portion of the community are distinguished by very laudable benevolence.

Your Committee are very glad to be able to bear testimony to the efficiency of the official staff.

Now, there are a few suggestions I beg leave to lay before you with regard to the Hospital and its management.

Firstly—The question of the establishment of private wards in connection with the Hospital, into which could be admitted patients who can well afford to pay a medical man for his services, but who for various reasons cannot be treated outside—for instance, residents in hotels, &c. These patients could have privileges which we cannot extend to patients in the ordinary wards, and might be liable to a fee such as £3 3s. per week. There need be no special expense incurred in the establishment of these wards except isolation from the rest of the Hospital by lattice-work. I should recommend that that portion of the main building which is at present used as a consulting-room and operating-room should be converted into one; a large ventilator be constructed through the roof, which improvement I regard as absolutely necessary even at the present time; and that a new consulting-room and operating-room with skylights in addition to windows be built, connecting with the main building by a covered way.

Secondly—I would recommend the engagement of a thoroughly qualified hospital nurse, experienced in surgery, medicine, and midwifery, under whom should be placed at least two female probationers whom she would be expected to train in the proper performance of their duties. This would necessitate the erection of two additional bedrooms.

Thirdly—I should recommend in order to ensure greater purity of the water collected from the roofs of the Hospital some scheme be devised whereby the first water to fall (which naturally washes the roofs) could be diverted into certain tanks kept for certain purposes; and when the water is coming off the roof perfectly pure it could be turned into tanks kept expressly for drinking and for surgical and medical purposes.

Fourthly—I should recommend that the underside of the verandah roofs should be painted a dark green to promote coolness; and that something be done in the way of ceiling the lock wards. I would also like to point out the necessity of having some sort of a screen in front of the door of the morgue, so that when work is going on the door may be kept open without shocking the sensibilities of the passers-by.

There are a couple of other matters I would like to draw attention to. One is the difficulty of treating properly the cases of secondary syphilis occurring among the men working in the fleets. This is a disease which if taken in time and thoroughly treated for a space of twelve or eighteen months, is distinctly curable, but if not so treated it reaches a stage in which the sufferer is more or less unable to follow his regular employment. Therefore the importance of treating it thoroughly in its earlier stages. Now I could mention instances where I have examined patients, have given them medicine to take away with them, and have also given them letters to their employers directing that they should present themselves from time to time for further supplies. As an invariable rule I never see these cases again.

Another matter is the number of cases sent into the Hospital when it is too late to render assistance. It would be to the interests of the employers of labour to see that these cases arrived at the hospital in a more hopeful condition. When cases are sent in from the fleets those responsible for them should see that they are brought to the Hospital. Of course with residents of the island, they are their own masters and can do as they think best themselves.

G. V. WHITE.

Hon. Treasurer’s Report

In presenting the statement of Receipts and Expenditure for 1899 it should be noticed that there is due to the institution from the Government the following amounts, which are not included in the statement:—

£

s.

d.

Endowment on Subscriptions for fourth quarter

169

8

0

Refund of Seamen’s Contributions for third quarter

176

18

0

Endowment on Seamen’s Contributions for third quarter

176

18

0

Refund of Seamen’s Contributions for fourth quarter

97

4

0

Endowment on Seamen’s Contributions for fourth quarter

97

4

0

Total

717

12

0

From this has to be deducted several outstanding accounts to the amount of

113

18

7

603

13

5

Credit Balances at Banks

1643

17

8

Total

2247

11

1

WILLIAM HARRYS, Hon. Treasurer.


TORRES STRAITS HOSPITAL

Statement of Receipts and Expenditure for the Year 1899

Receipts

£

s.

d.

To Balance, 1st January, 1899

852

11

11

Private Contributions

155

18

6

Endowment on Contributions

157

3

0

Seamen’s Contributions

618

5

0

Endowment on Seamen’s Contributions

1016

4

0

Police Court Fines

54

15

0

In-door Patients

59

4

0

Out-door Patients

1

0

0

Interest

31

8

9

Total

£2946

10

2

Expenditure

£

s.

d.

By Building and Improvement Account

258

2

6

Furniture and Fixtures

8

4

4

Bedlinen and Drapery

35

1

4

Groceries

344

11

9

Meat, Bread, and Vegetables

214

13

3

Wood, Water, and Laundry Work

45

0

11

Advertising, Printing, and Stationery

20

3

10

Drugs and Surgical Instruments

128

7

2

Interments

53

5

0

Salaries and Wages

575

12

0

General Expenses

119

10

5

Bank of North Queensland (Balance per 31st December, 1899)

1143

17

8

Total

£2946

10

2

Bank of North Queensland, Fixed Deposit — £300 0s. 0d.
Government Savings Bank — £200 0s. 0d.

Examined and found correct.

HARRY SNOWDEN,
FRED. C. HODEL, } Auditors.

WILLIAM HARRYS, Treasurer.
DAVID DIETRICHSON, Secretary.

Thursday Island,
13th January, 1900.


List of Governors.

F. C. Hodel

Kumakichi Ogawa

Senior Sergeant M‘Creery

Shichinosuki Ogawa

George Pearson

Katsuzo Oda

R. Cohen

Chuzaburo Okomoto

W. T. Sullivan

Genzaburo Otake

D. C. Bromley

Masukichi Suzuki

G. H. Bennett

Bunzo Sakamoto

W. Harrys

Chotaro Shibata

P. J. Doyle

Yoshinobu Tatsuya

F. J. Beor

Zentaro Teramoto

Geo. Donald

Kumaichi Azechi

H. P. Beach

Masataro Fukushima

T. Satow

Gohei Hayashi

Geo. Smith

Kiichi Hirayama

Alb. Colless

Genskichi Hayashi

Abi. Murray

Kosaku Higashi

A. B. Macgill

Naoziro Hara

H. A. C. Douglas

Genpachi Iguchi

F. Norbury

Iwakichi Kawabata

W. Campbell

Sanmatsu Kashi

W. Adkins

Kikujiro Kawakami

R. Soopaya

Otomatsu Kobori

W. Davies

Harumatsu Kawaoka

A. Darr

Kichimatsu K. Maeda

G. H. Hodder

Chogoro Morioka

H. Snowdon

Inosuke Matsumura

Munro, Outridge, and Co.

Shinpachi Minami

A. Corran

Sanzo Noharo

Geo. Gummow

Masataro Nakane

J. L. Le Breton

Tsunematsu Nishi

Hon. J. Douglas

Harumatsu Ozaki

T. H. Willmett

Hirai Ozaki

Geo. Cockburn

Bunkichi Osuka

Thos. J. Farquhar

Fuzinatsu Okaji

Joseph Mitchell

Ichimatsu Okano

George Byres

Chutaro Oya

Jas. Young

Goro Oda

Mrs. T. Satow

Unosuke Okamoto

Mrs Dr. Sugiyama

Tomijiro Okomoto

Dr. Gensaku Sugiyama

Yashuziro Sakai

Isaburo Sumiyoshi

Hiramatsu Shirano

Rinzi Azechi

Kurakichi Saka

Sanzo Awa

Kikujiro Kawakami

Bungoro Deguchi

Otomatsu Kobori

Mrs. B. Deguchi

Harumatsu Kawaoka

Arataro Fukagawa

Torres Straits Shipwright Co.

Saisuke Nishimura

Shimitaro Takeda

Toranosuke Nakayama

Saikichi Urita

Tomizo Nishikado

Masakichi Uyeno

Ichimatsu Nishiyama

Tozaburo Uchida

Yaye Nakamura

Yasotaro Yasukochi

Denkichi Okazi

Zenkichi Yoshida

Sutematsu Yokohata